Positional Compatibility > All (Exceptions Included)

Observation: After starting to align myself more in line with a copywriter's mindset, I start to notice plenty of double meanings everywhere. This is one of them:

Private Structure Puns. Focus on "Casual Top", "Casual Bottom" and "Shop By Cutting".

I've been thinking again about relationships, not about getting one (although that would be a bonus) but about the things you have to look out for before starting one. I've done some of the preliminary discussion in my previous post here, and I just want to expand on that thinking. But to sum up, that post talks about having no expectations, with any perks being a complete bonus.

The more I think, the more I believe that your partner has to be your positional counterpart: top-bottom, versatile-versatile, versatile (preferring top)-versatile (preferring bottom), or non-penetrative-non-penetrative. This is the absolute mix up if you want to settle down with the principles of homosexual fidelity (when you take flings and casual ONS into account, the equation breaks apart) and it's more important than dominance. I'm not saying that other mix ups will not work, but there will be more than plenty of compromises to be made. Sex isn't everything anyway.

And no matter how much people say that versatiles do not exist, I believe in the concept much. Read it up a little in my previous post here.

And what's up with the whole 'if a gay person asks another gay person to have dinner together it means he is interested in him' misconception? People, there is such thing as an ordinary friendship; the only thing different is that both persons share the same sexual orientation. Same goes for the 'the only reason a gay person goes to a gay club is to get hooked up' mentality. Seriously, stop giving everyone else reason to stereotype us anymore.

Still giving much thought to going down to Singapore for the Pink Dot event:

More importantly, still dreaming a reality for Pink Dot Malaysia. We can't possibly wait till legalization is done, civil rights are always won the hard way.

Meh.